Recent UNESCO reporting (2024) confirmed the site’s official area at 638 ha after correcting a cartographic error from 2007. Management faces new challenges: predation of pelican eggs by invasive raccoon dogs and, more rarely, golden jackals, sometimes facilitated by late ice formation after mild winters. These factors have prompted measures such as protective fencing around nesting sites. The hydrological system and monitoring remain essential to maintain ecological values, while updated management planning and maintenance of hydraulic structures are priorities for sustaining the lake’s ecological health.
Stabilise and raise water levels in the lake to support wetland ecological functions.
Reduce eutrophication by flushing the lake annually with Danube water, thereby improving water quality.
Enhance biodiversity, with a focus on maintaining and increasing populations of key wetland species such as the Dalmatian pelican (Pelecanus crispus).
Comply with international commitments under the Ramsar Convention and later UNESCO World Heritage requirements, by halting ecological degradation.
| Authority type | Authority name | Role | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activity stage | Name | Key issues | Comments |
|---|
| Target purpose |
|---|
|
Runoff control
|
|
Improved Biodiversity
|
|
Increase Water Storage
|
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Name | Comments |
|---|
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Water quality: nutrient concentrations (e.g. total phosphorus, total nitrogen), chlorophyll-a, transparency (Secchi depth).
Biota: population size and breeding success of key species (especially Dalmatian pelican), composition of aquatic vegetation (extent of reed beds), presence of invasive species.
Threat factors: incidence of predation on pelican colonies, climatic events affecting ice formation, and habitat condition in the buffer zone.
Cultural and scientific value : The site’s international designations have increased its profile, drawing scientists, students, and NGOs for research and conservation projects, and providing opportunities for capacity building among local staff.
Job creation : The reserve’s management provides employment for guards, maintenance workers, and guides, mainly under the RIEW Ruse administration, as well as seasonal work during specific conservation actions (e.g. fencing the pelican colony).
This intervention raised and stabilised water levels in the lake.
Other wetland bird populations and aquatic vegetation (extensive reed beds) were maintained or expanded in the years following reconnection.
Recent monitoring highlights negative impacts from predation by invasive raccoon dogs and, occasionally, golden jackals, sometimes facilitated by ice cover in late winter. Anti-predation measures (e.g. fencing) have been implemented to protect nests.
Another lesson is that restoration requires ongoing management. Infrastructure such as the canal and sluice must be maintained to keep hydrological functions effective. Without regular inspection, dredging, and repair, the benefits could be lost.
The case also highlights the need for continuous monitoring and adaptive responses. Tracking water quality, water levels, and biodiversity allows managers to react to emerging threats, such as invasive raccoon dogs and golden jackals preying on pelican nests, which required new measures like protective fencing.
Finally, Srebarna shows the value of linking conservation with socio-economic benefits. Its status as a UNESCO and Ramsar site has attracted ecotourism, education, and scientific research, benefiting local communities. At the same time, restrictions on resource use illustrate the need to balance ecological protection with local livelihoods through participatory planning.
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | Order |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Legal obligations
|
main factor
|
Strong legal protection and designation : UNESCO World Heritage and Ramsar statuses, plus Natura 2000 listing, ensured high conservation priority and obligations for management. |
|
|
Attitude of decision makers
|
secondary factor
|
The Ministry of Environment and Water, through RIEW Ruse, provides an institutional framework for daily management, enforcement, and monitoring. |
|
|
Conducted assessments (incl. economic)
|
secondary factor
|
Ongoing ecological monitoring : Regular tracking of hydrology, water quality, vegetation, and bird populations allowed adaptive management and targeted interventions (e.g. anti-predation measures). |
|
|
Conducted assessments (incl. economic)
|
main factor
|
Integration of socio-economic benefits : Ecotourism, education, and research activities linked to the reserve’s international profile have generated local economic opportunities and public support for conservation. |
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments | Order |
|---|