Skip to main content

OPTAIN : Čechtický stream catchment [Czech Republic]

Last update
2025
Summary
The Cechticky stream catchment case study is located at the Central Bohemian Region of the Czech Republic. The catchment area is about 72 km², most of which is used as agricultural land (69%). Fifty nine percent of which is cropland. Čechtický stream catchment is a part of the Želivka river basin, which includes the Švihov drinking water reservoir. The reservoir is currently facing persistent problems with poor water quality linked to phosphorus, nitrogen and pesticide pollution. The area is also threatened by soil erosion in large fields as well as poor soil quality linked to dehumidification, soil compaction and increasing periods of drought. Tile drainage is common in the area and issues linked to technical failures, unintended runoff and poor quality are increasing.

OPTAIN aims to develop strategies and advanced tools for designing and evaluating the effectiveness of Natural Small Water Retention Measures taking into account the principles of their feasibility in small agricultural river basins in terms of increasing water accumulation and retention and improving water quality. Emphasis will be placed on measures on agricultural drainage systems in terms of possibility of their modernization, regulation, professional elimination.
Position
Latitude
50.51159
Longitude
15.61694
Project
OPTAIN
National Id
CZ_06
Installation date
2019
Contact
Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation- Dr. Petr Fučík fucik.petr@vumop.cz

NUTS Code
CZ06 - Jihovýchod
Involved Partners
Authority type Authority name Role Comments
Research institute / University
VUMOP (Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation)
Determination of design details of the measure
Farmers
Farmers and land owners
Implementation
Other
State Land Office (Land Consolidation)
Initiation of the measure

Climate

Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Annual Averages:
Precipitation
660 - 780
Temperature
9.1°C
Evapotranspiration
519
Runoff
90.7 mm/year

Geography

Slope range
6-12%
Soil type
Cambisol
Groundwater level
1.2-4.6 meters
Vegetation class
Arable land, Grassland, Forest.

Scale of the project

Project scale
Meso

Size of the project

Project area
72 km2
Area subject to Land use change or Management/Practice change (ha)
Land use change takes place in some designed and modelled NSWRMs. I.e. within Grassing of reacharge area and grassed waterways.
Catchment area
72
Design land use change
Land use change type Comment

Financing authorities
Authority name Type of funding Financing share Comments

Policy and general governance summary

The stream catchment area is facing issues of water pollution and soil degradation due to poor land management and agricultural practices. Soil erosion caused by large agricultural fields is endangering soil quality, resulting in lowered water retention at soil level. Mechanised agricultural practices are also resulting in increased soil compaction. The impacts of soil erosion and poor soil quality are expected to increase with longer periods of drought.

In addition, dense tile drainage systems which ensure draining of agricultural plots are becoming problematic as they increase runoff, poor water quality, and lack of maintenance is increasing failure.

Wider plan type
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments
Policy target
Target purpose
Erosion Control
Pollutants Removal
Policy impact
Impact directive Relevant impact
Community involvment
No
Policy pressure
Pressure directive Relevant pressure
Requirement directive
Requirement directive Specification
Water Framework Directive (WFD) 2000/60/EC
Other EU
Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive – 2009/128/EC
Nitrate Directive (NiD) 91/676/EEC
Contractual arrangements
0
Design contractual arrangement
Arrangement type Responsibility Role Name Comments
Design consultation activity
Activity stage Name Key issues Comments
Policy area
Policy area type Policy area focus Name Comments
Primary
Common Agricultural Policy
Common Agricultural Policy
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plan Regulation – 2021/2115 (while not a directive, the CAP provides the funding mechanism and policy framework that supports implementation of all the above practices through Eco-schemes, Agri-environment-climate measures (AECMs), and Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition (GAEC) standards under cross-compliance rules)
Primary
Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive

Costs operation maintenance
Under River basin authority and Czech Soil Erosion monitoring programme
WFD ecological status obj quantity
Moderate - to - Poor

Success factor(s)
Success factor type Success factor role Comments Order
Barrier
Barrier type Barrier role Comments Order
Attitude of relevant stakeholders
main barrier
Land user / land owner issues
Lacking financing sources
main barrier
Measures maintenance costs
Driver
Driver type Driver role Comments Order