It was the first programme of this scale to combine forest-based retention with flood and drought mitigation. Over time, thousands of small hydraulic structures (ponds, weirs, ditches, culverts) were installed, enhancing water retention and reducing peak flows. For instance, in the Świętokrzyskie region, 43 reservoirs and 61 small barriers retain over 1 million m³ of water.
The programme has continued under successive phases and remains a key component of Poland’s climate adaptation strategy. As of 2023–2025, additional funding (including EU funds) supports the development of lowland and mountain retention systems, with proven benefits: higher groundwater levels, improved soil moisture, and enhanced biodiversity. The approach focuses on restoring natural hydrology without disrupting forest functions.
Institutional coordination has improved, with national guidelines, monitoring tools, and good practices shared via the State Forests Centre for Coordination of Environmental Projects (CKPŚ). The programme is now considered a model of nature-based climate resilience in forestry.
2. Reduce the risk of floods and droughts
3. Restore natural hydrological functions of forest landscapes
4. Support biodiversity and improve habitat conditions
5. Integrate water retention into sustainable forest management
| Authority type | Authority name | Role | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activity stage | Name | Key issues | Comments |
|---|
| Target purpose |
|---|
|
Increase Water Storage
|
|
Groundwater Recharge
|
|
Runoff control
|
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Name | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Institutional arrangement
|
Agreement between between the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Economy and the Minister of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry of Poland on cooperation in the field of the development of small water retention
|
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|
Local Economic Functions at Community Level : Small water power (micro-hydro), Fish breeding, Water supply for agriculture and forestry, Recreational uses.
Broad Ecosystem-Based Socio-Economic Value : The Biodiversity Information System notes that combining forest retention with flood prevention provides a model of environmentally friendly infrastructure that supports biodiversity protection and has significant socio‑economic influence, reinforcing benefits beyond strictly hydrological functions.
Providing habitat for typical wetland flora species: Iris sibirica; Cypripedium calceolus; Eriphorum vaginatum; Oxycoccus palustris; Nymphaea alba; Nymphaea candida
providing habitat for typical wetland fauna species: Hyla arborea; Emys orbicularis; Salamandra salamandra; Castor fiber; Lyrurus tetrix
Long-term national coordination is essential : The success of the program depended on a centralised coordination mechanism (via CKPŚ within Lasy Państwowe) and integration into national strategies and EU programmes. This long-term governance model ensured continuity across funding cycles and administrative changes.
Multifunctionality increases value : The project illustrates how forest infrastructure can be designed to serve multiple functions: hydrological regulation, biodiversity support, recreation, local livelihoods (fish farming, micro-hydro). This multifunctional approach strengthens public and institutional support.
Monitoring and adaptive management are needed : While basic monitoring was implemented (e.g. structure condition, groundwater), limited data on water quality, biodiversity trends, or long-term climate impacts suggests a need for stronger environmental monitoring to guide adaptive management.
Public forest ownership enabled rapid implementation : Because the land was publicly owned and managed, the program avoided complex land acquisition or permitting procedures, enabling efficient and large-scale implementation. This highlights the strategic value of public land in green infrastructure projects.
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | Order |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Other
|
main factor
|
Public ownership of land – Simplified implementation on State-managed forest lands without land acquisition issues. |
|
|
Attitude of relevant stakeholders
|
secondary factor
|
Strong institutional coordination – Led by Lasy Państwowe and CKPŚ, ensuring consistency across regions. |
|
|
Financing possibilities
|
main factor
|
EU and national co-financing – Stable funding from the Cohesion Fund, EcoFund, and national environmental budgets. |
|
|
Existing staff and consultant knowledge
|
secondary factor
|
Local implementation capacity – Forest districts had technical expertise and staff for design, maintenance, and monitoring. |
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments | Order |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Balancing different objectives
|
main driver
|
necesity to improve water amangement in forest lowlands
|
1
|
|
Availability of subsidies
|
main driver
|
Cohesion Fund in frames of Operational Programme, 2007-2014
|
2
|