Last update
2025
Summary
Aquifer recharge with highly polished treated effluents. With a high population density and almost no surface waters, Malta faces chronic over-abstraction: total demand exceeds the sustainable yield of naturally renewable freshwater. Demand comes from domestic and agricultural uses (domestic peaks can exceed agriculture during the tourist season). Groundwater quality is threatened by nitrates and seawater intrusion.
A pilot at Bulebel (2010–2013, MEDIWAT) tested injection of ultra-polished reclaimed water via an injection well under strict quality monitoring. Since then, Malta has pursued MAR within a broader strategy: the EU MARSOL demonstrator (2013–2017) designed an injection-well barrier near the Malta South plant (Ta’ Barkat) to counter seawater intrusion; the national New Water programme is expanding reclaimed-water production (~7 Mm³/yr capacity) and distribution for agriculture, creating seasonal surpluses that can supply MAR. Under the LIFE-IP RBMP (2021–2027), Action C8 is developing a pilot MAR scheme in the Pwales coastal groundwater body using reclaimed water when irrigation demand is low; a 2024 hydrogeological study characterised Pwales to support MAR design.
A pilot at Bulebel (2010–2013, MEDIWAT) tested injection of ultra-polished reclaimed water via an injection well under strict quality monitoring. Since then, Malta has pursued MAR within a broader strategy: the EU MARSOL demonstrator (2013–2017) designed an injection-well barrier near the Malta South plant (Ta’ Barkat) to counter seawater intrusion; the national New Water programme is expanding reclaimed-water production (~7 Mm³/yr capacity) and distribution for agriculture, creating seasonal surpluses that can supply MAR. Under the LIFE-IP RBMP (2021–2027), Action C8 is developing a pilot MAR scheme in the Pwales coastal groundwater body using reclaimed water when irrigation demand is low; a 2024 hydrogeological study characterised Pwales to support MAR design.
Position
Latitude
35.864492
Longitude
14.523394
Project
NWRM
National Id
Malta_01
Installation date
2010
Implementation Status
Contact
Camille Parrod, ACTeon
RBD code
MTMALTA
Transboundary
0
Photo gallery
Location of the project
Location on Bulebel Industrial Estate in Zejtun (southern region of Malta), overlying a degraded part of the sea level aquifer system, next to the old Sant’Antnin Waste Water Treatment Plant and surrounded by unutilized wells
NUTS Code
MT00 - Malta
Project's objectives
Evaluate the technical & economic feasibility of using highly-polished treated effluent for artificial recharge of Malta’s sea-level aquifers.
Determine the scale of impacts on aquifer status; enhance sustainability of freshwater systems; assess usability for irrigation.
Pilot configuration: UF+RO polishing, one injection well + 2–3 monitoring wells; test recharge at ~35 m³/day.
Determine the scale of impacts on aquifer status; enhance sustainability of freshwater systems; assess usability for irrigation.
Pilot configuration: UF+RO polishing, one injection well + 2–3 monitoring wells; test recharge at ~35 m³/day.
Involved Partners
| Authority type | Authority name | Role | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
Climate zone
warm temperate dry
Temperature
18.6 °C
Annual rainfall range
300 - 600 mm
Remarks runoff imperviousness
Infiltration from rainfalls is estimated to be only 19% of the annual rainfall. Note that information linked specifically to the site of the application is not available – the scale of data is thus the island of Malta.
Elevation range
45 m
Soil type
Calcisols
Groundwater level
‘poor’ qualitative status
Vegetation class
Dryland cropland/meadows—non-irrigated arable fields with scattered trees (carob, olive) and ruderal shrubs; immediately adjacent to/within an industrial estate (impervious surfaces at the injection works).
Water bodies: Ecological Status
Good
Water bodies: Chemical Status
Good
Water quality status
Threshold Values for Chloride and Electrical Conductivity are exceeded in seven and six monitoring stations respectively, a clear indication of saline intrusion. Threshold values for Lead and Ammonium were exceeded in one station.
Project scale
Micro
Project scale specification
An artificial recharge plant and two monitoring wells
Performance timescale
< 1 year
Project area
216.6 km2
Evaluation of the feasibility (technical and economic) of using highly polished treated effluent for the artificial recharge of the island’s sea level aquifer systems.
Determination of the scale of the impact of artificial recharge on the status of the aquifer; enhance the sustainability of (aquifer) freshwater systems; usability for irrigation.
Determination of the scale of the impact of artificial recharge on the status of the aquifer; enhance the sustainability of (aquifer) freshwater systems; usability for irrigation.
Facilities included:
Ultrafiltration and Reverse Osmosis Unit
Test-site, injection well and three monitoring wells Tools included:
Water level and water quality monitoring probes
Data loggers for continuous in-situ monitoring
On the scale of the island: three treatment plants produce app. 17 million m3 of treated effluent annually. Out of these 17 million m3, current use is estimated at 1.2 million m3 overall (constrained by a lack of a dedicated distribution network).
On the scale of the application:
Quality: ±105 mg/l of Nitrate content was mitigated. All tested organic pollutants except Dibromochloromethane yielded a negative result. Also, Alkylbenzene content in unpolished effluent ranged between 1.5 and 2.8 ug/l.
Quantity: water level in the first well showed an increase of ±1.3m over the drawdown levels and 0.6m over the long-term background level; water level in the second well showed a variation of 0.8m compared to 0.5m pre-recharge.
Ultrafiltration and Reverse Osmosis Unit
Test-site, injection well and three monitoring wells Tools included:
Water level and water quality monitoring probes
Data loggers for continuous in-situ monitoring
On the scale of the island: three treatment plants produce app. 17 million m3 of treated effluent annually. Out of these 17 million m3, current use is estimated at 1.2 million m3 overall (constrained by a lack of a dedicated distribution network).
On the scale of the application:
Quality: ±105 mg/l of Nitrate content was mitigated. All tested organic pollutants except Dibromochloromethane yielded a negative result. Also, Alkylbenzene content in unpolished effluent ranged between 1.5 and 2.8 ug/l.
Quantity: water level in the first well showed an increase of ±1.3m over the drawdown levels and 0.6m over the long-term background level; water level in the second well showed a variation of 0.8m compared to 0.5m pre-recharge.
Design capacity description
±105 mg/l of Nitrate content in the arriving effluent was mitigated, increase of ±1.3m post-artificial recharge over the drawdown levels and 0.6m over the long-term background level
The main constraints limiting the application of this technique are not so much island-size specific, but more related to the availability, the quality of the polished effluent and the cost of implementing the technique.
The factors that influenced the selection and design of the application are linked to the context of over-abstraction of the aquifers due to the high water-demands on the island and to legal requirements (especially under the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC), as well as the Water Framework and Groundwater Directives) – including the achievement of the good status objectives of the Water Framework Directive (Dir 2000/60/EC).
The factors that influenced the selection and design of the application are linked to the context of over-abstraction of the aquifers due to the high water-demands on the island and to legal requirements (especially under the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC), as well as the Water Framework and Groundwater Directives) – including the achievement of the good status objectives of the Water Framework Directive (Dir 2000/60/EC).
Availability of sufficient treated effluent; quality of the polished effluent; production costs for delivering and polishing the effluent; short- and long-term cyclic behaviour in the water levels.
Location (next to a wastewater treatment plant); available equipment.
Positive influence effectiveness
Bulebel overlies a degraded part of the sea level aquifer system; it has a constant supply of treated effluent from an existing plant (the old Sant’Antnin one); it is surrounded by unutilized wells which can be utilized for monitoring.
Financing authorities
Type of funding
EU-funds: Cohesion and regional development funds
Comments
As part of the MEDIWAT project
Compensations
0
Policy context
With a high population density and almost inexistent surface waters, Malta is in a situation of over abstraction of its groundwater resources and where its total water demand exceeds the sustainable yield of the naturally renewable freshwater resources. Demand comes from the domestic and agricultural sectors alike (the domestic use can even exceed the agricultural use with the arrival of tourists during touristic seasons). From a qualitative point of view, freshwater resources are also under threat resulting from nitrates and salt water intrusions.
Land ownership
The site lies within Bulebel Industrial Estate, a government-owned estate administered by INDIS Malta.
Community involvment
No
Design consultation activity
| Activity stage | Name | Key issues | Comments |
|---|
Policy target
| Target purpose |
|---|
|
Groundwater Recharge
|
|
Pollutants Removal
|
Target Remarks
Natural assimilation (purification) of effluents through dilution, dispersion, and physic-chemical processes
Regulation of the chemical status of freshwater
Self-regulation of water by filtration / storage / accumulation by ecosystems
While the primary target of this application is the assimilation (purification) of effluents to recharge the aquifer, it is only partly done in a natural way (passage through porous rock), as they are artificially treated first.
Regulation of the chemical status of freshwater
Self-regulation of water by filtration / storage / accumulation by ecosystems
While the primary target of this application is the assimilation (purification) of effluents to recharge the aquifer, it is only partly done in a natural way (passage through porous rock), as they are artificially treated first.
Policy pressure
| Pressure directive | Relevant pressure |
|---|---|
|
WFD identified pressure
|
1.1 Point – Urban waste water
|
|
WFD identified pressure
|
3.2 Abstraction – Public Water Supply
|
|
WFD identified pressure
|
3.1 Abstraction – Agriculture
|
|
Other EU
|
Groundwater Directive Direct and indirect inputs of hazardous substances in groundwater
|
Policy impact
| Impact directive | Relevant impact |
|---|---|
|
WFD identified impact
|
Abstraction exceeds available GW resource (lowering water table)
|
|
WFD identified impact
|
Saline pollution
|
|
WFD identified impact
|
Nutrient pollution
|
Requirement directive
| Requirement directive | Specification |
|---|---|
|
WFD-restoring a HMWB
|
|
|
Water Framework Directive (WFD) 2000/60/EC
|
WFD-achievement of good GWB quantitative status
|
|
Other EU
|
Groundwater Directive-protection of the qualitative status of the receiving GWB
|
|
Other EU
|
Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
|
Requirement directive remarks
The adoption by Malta and other Mediterranean countries of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive has seen the commissioning of an increasing number of wastewater treatment plants treating water prior to its discharge into the sea or other inland freshwater bodies. Re-use of treated effluents is progressively seen as a new source of water in local contexts of high stress-levels on freshwater resources and semi-arid climate. The Directive was transposed in Malta under the Environment Protection Act (2001) and its Urban Waste Water Treatment Regulations (2005). However, an issue concerns the controls on the qualitative status of water that need to be carried out, including a prior authorization by competent authorities of artificial recharge or augmentation of GWB.
Contractual arrangements
0
| Arrangement type | Responsibility | Role | Name | Comments |
|---|
Part of wider plan
0
Wider plan type
| Wider plan type | Wider plan focus | Name | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Environment & Biodiversity
|
MEDIWAT project
|
Sustainable management of environmental issues related to water stress in Mediterranean Islands
Second call of the MED programme (2007-2013). It involved 10 partners covering 6 NUTS II regions (islands in France, Italy, Greece, Spain, Malta and Cyprus). It was co-financed by the European Union and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) |
Water level (height of water column above probe), salinity, electrical conductivity and groundwater temperature. Organic pollutants (Pharmaceuticals - Carbamezepine, Acetominophen, Diazemam, Diclofenac, Dilantin, Fluoxetine, Gemfibrozil, Hydrocodone, Ibuprofen, Iopromide, Meprobamate, Naproxen, Pentoxifylene, Mefanamic Acid
Solvents/Plasticizers/Surfactants - Dibutylphtalate, Glycol Ether, Alkyl Benzene, Dibromochloromethane, Perfluorooctanic Acid, Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid, BisphenolA
Personal Care Products - Caffeine, Galoxolide, Oxybenzone, TCEP and DEET
Steroids - Androstenedione, Estradiol, Estriol, Estrone, Ethinylestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone
AntiMicrobial Agents - Trimethoprim, Triclosan, Sulfamedthoxazole, Erythromycin) and conventional pollutants (electrical conductivity, chloride, nitrate and bacterial content).
Solvents/Plasticizers/Surfactants - Dibutylphtalate, Glycol Ether, Alkyl Benzene, Dibromochloromethane, Perfluorooctanic Acid, Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid, BisphenolA
Personal Care Products - Caffeine, Galoxolide, Oxybenzone, TCEP and DEET
Steroids - Androstenedione, Estradiol, Estriol, Estrone, Ethinylestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone
AntiMicrobial Agents - Trimethoprim, Triclosan, Sulfamedthoxazole, Erythromycin) and conventional pollutants (electrical conductivity, chloride, nitrate and bacterial content).
Catchment outlet
Background conditions at the recharge site monitored through two wells located in the immediate vicinity of the recharge well (pre-recharge): use of two multi-parametric groundwater probes; Water level monitoring (post-recharge): use of a water level contact gauge.
Water storage and natural barrier against salt intrusion functions for water security and water provision services. New Water is documented to target ~35% of agricultural demand at full capacity, indicating a system-level benefit relevant for MAR supply/seasonality.
Information on Increased groundwater level
+1.3 m and +0.8 m post-recharge
Information on Water quality overall improvements
very low residual organics after polishing; nitrate ~105 mg/L mitigated in the feed—these remain the main published quantitative results.
Key lessons
A hydro-geological assessment of the aquifer system must be carried out before any artificial recharge scheme using treated effluents is implemented, in order to assess the prevalence of local and regional groundwater flow should anything go wrong. Effluents should undergo further treatment in order to comply with the EU Directives' requirements concerning recharge of groundwater bodies.
Any proposed artificial recharge scheme using treated effluents should seriously consider the impact on the aquifer system, through a hydro-geological assessment of the aquifer system in order to assess the prevalence of local and regional groundwater flow. If not so, groundwater users located in the immediate vicinity of the scheme could be strongly impacted should an unplanned incident occur, whereas the impact on a regional scale could only be minor.
Any proposed artificial recharge scheme using treated effluents should seriously consider the impact on the aquifer system, through a hydro-geological assessment of the aquifer system in order to assess the prevalence of local and regional groundwater flow. If not so, groundwater users located in the immediate vicinity of the scheme could be strongly impacted should an unplanned incident occur, whereas the impact on a regional scale could only be minor.
Success factor(s)
| Success factor type | Success factor role | Comments | Order |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Financing possibilities
|
main factor
|
<p>Financing for the treatment of effluents that will be injected into the aquifer</p>
|
1
|
|
Other
|
main factor
|
<p>Location of the recharge facility (close to a wastewater treatment plant)</p>
|
2
|
|
Existing regulations
|
secondary factor
|
<p>Enforcement of control for illegal abstractions</p>
|
3
|
Driver
| Driver type | Driver role | Comments | Order |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Legal obligations
|
main driver
|
WFD requirements (annual abstraction from the groundwater body does not exceed the long-term annual average rate of overall recharge of the body of groundwater; necessary controls are in place to eliminate the possibility of any degradation in the qualitative status of the receiving body of groundwater)
|
1
|
|
Other
|
main driver
|
Availability of European funding for research projects in this area
|
2
|
Basin characteristics influence
Fairly stable background conditions of the aquifer at the recharge site allowed for the monitoring to take place. However, short- and longterm cyclic behaviour in the water levels was observed
English