Skip to main content

Positive long-term effect of mulching on a nutrient-poor mountain meadow, Czechia

Last update
2025
Summary
This case study reports a 13-year management experiment on an oligotrophic mountain meadow in Šumava National Park, Czech Republic. After the end of hay-making and autumn grazing, three regimes were compared on permanent plots cut each July. Mulching left the cut biomass in place, mowing removed it, and fallow had no cutting. The site sits at 1160 m on acidic brown soils with cool, wet climate. Monitoring combined yearly vegetation surveys in nested 1 m² plots and pre-treatment biomass harvests.

Mulching maintained biomass while improving diversity and soil condition. Mean aboveground biomass averaged 319 g m⁻² under mulching, 301 g m⁻² under mowing, and 386 g m⁻² in fallow. Species richness in mulched plots increased from 11.2 to 18.6 species per m² between 1997 and 2009, with a shift from grass dominance to forb-rich swards. By year nine, soils in mulched plots showed higher pHKCl (3.8 to 4.4), organic matter (4.6–6.3%), total N (0.31–0.45%), and greater plant-available P, K, Mg and Ca.

Functional trait analyses revealed communities under mulching moved toward acquisitive strategies with higher SLA, LNC and LPC and lower LDMC, SDMC, C:N and plant height. Many trait diversities increased with mulching, although SLA diversity converged. In contrast, mowing alone tended to deplete nutrients and fallowing drove litter build-up and grass competition, both reducing diversity. Detectable ecological divergence among treatments appeared only after 5–6 years, reflecting slow responses in cold, acidic conditions. The authors conclude that annual mulching is a practical, biodiversity-friendly alternative where traditional grazing has ceased, provided site fertility remains low.
Position
Latitude
49.08
Longitude
13.55
Installation date
1997 to 2009
Implementation Status
Transboundary
0

Location of the project
Šumava National Park and Biosphere Reserve, Bohemian Forest Mts., Czech Republic. SW-facing slope.
Project's objectives
Test whether mulching can maintain or enhance plant species and functional trait diversity and sustain biomass production in oligotrophic mountain meadows after cessation of traditional hay-making and autumn grazing.
Involved Partners
Authority type Authority name Role Comments
Research institute / University
Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences
Implementation
Nature park
Administration of the Šumava National Park
Other
site access and liaison
Research institute / University
University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science
Other
field ecology, analysis
Research institute / University
Institute of Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Goethe University Frankfurt
Other
trait ecology
Research institute / University
Institute of Systems Biology and Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Other
soil and systems ecology

Climate zone
cool temperate moist
Temperature
4.8 °C
Annual rainfall range
900 - 1200 mm
Elevation range
1160 m
Slope range
SW-facing slope, 2–8° inclination.
Vegetation class
Original vegetation acidophilous meadow dominated by Deschampsia cespitosa, Festuca rubra, Agrostis capillaris, Hypericum maculatum.
Water bodies: Ecological Status
Moderate
Water bodies: Chemical Status
Failing to achieve good
Water quality status
Soil chemistry reported later in the experiment: in mulched plots, increases by 2007 in pHKCl (≈3.8 to 4.4), organic matter (≈4.6–6.3%), total N (≈0.31–0.45%), and plant-available P, K, Mg, Ca; limited changes in mown and fallow plots.

Project scale
Micro
Project scale specification
Micro-scale field experiment on a single meadow site. 12 ha surrounding context, experimental core 300 m × 400 m.
Project area
0.12 km² site footprint noted; vegetation and biomass measured in permanent 1 m × 1 m plots (five per treatment) with nested subplots.
1997 to 2009 continuous annual management and monitoring. Divergence among treatments became evident after 5–6 years.
Annual July defoliation under three regimes to compare biodiversity and productivity outcomes. Mulch left to decompose on site to recycle nutrients in an otherwise oligotrophic, acidic, cold-climate meadow.
Cold mountain climate and acidic soils slow vegetation response and mulch decomposition, making long-term monitoring essential. Low inherent soil fertility. Gentle slopes.

Total cost
unknown
Financing authorities
Compensations
0

Policy context
Experiment conducted within Šumava National Park and Biosphere Reserve to inform biodiversity-friendly, economically acceptable alternatives to traditional hay-making plus autumn grazing.
Land ownership
Experimental management started in 1997 and ran for 13 consecutive growing seasons to 2009. Project finished (field phase complete).
Community involvment
No
Design consultation activity
Activity stage Name Key issues Comments
Policy target
Target purpose
Target Remarks
Maintain plant species richness and functional diversity while sustaining biomass in nutrient-poor mountain meadows when traditional practices cease.
Policy pressure
Pressure directive Relevant pressure
Pressures remarks
Abandonment of traditional management, nutrient depletion under mowing-only, grass domination and litter accumulation under fallowing, regional biodiversity decline in seminatural meadows.
Policy impact
Impact directive Relevant impact
Requirement directive
Requirement directive Specification
Contractual arrangements
0
Arrangement type Responsibility Role Name Comments
Part of wider plan
0
Wider plan type
Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments

Five permanent 1 m × 1 m plots per treatment with nine 0.33 m × 0.33 m subplots each; annual vegetation cover surveys from 1997–2009; annual pre-treatment biomass harvests at set July dates; soil chemistry compared early and at year 9; extensive plant trait datasets compiled from European grassland trait databases.
Maintenance
Annual July cutting under the assigned regime for each plot. Mulch left in place on mulched plots; hay removed on mown plots; no cutting on fallow.
Ordination and constrained ordination (PCA, RDA), community-weighted means (CWM), Rao’s quadratic entropy for functional diversity (FD), beta-diversity partitioning per Jost, regression of biomass versus diversity and trait metrics.
Mulching maintained or enhanced plant species and functional diversity while keeping relatively high biomass production. It countered nutrient loss seen under mowing-only and avoided the diversity decline and litter build-up seen under fallowing.
Under mulching, FD for SLA decreased over time despite increases in mean SLA, indicating convergence for this trait even as other traits diverged. Fallowing led to grass dominance and litter accumulation with gradual diversity loss. Mowing-only led to gradual nutrient depletion and reduced productivity.
Hydrological effects
Not assessed
Information on Water quality overall improvements
Mulched plots showed by year 9 increases in soil pH, organic matter, total N and exchangeable P, K, Mg, Ca; mown and fallow changed little. Mechanism attributed to mulch mineralisation and enhanced microbial activity and legumes.
Species richness in mulched plots increased from 11.2 to 18.6 species per 1 m² over 13 years. Proportion of forbs rose from ~20% to ~60%, grasses declined from ~75% to ~20% in mulched plots. Functional trait shifts toward acquisitive strategies: higher LNC, LPC, SLA; lower LDMC, SDMC, C:N, and plant height. Functional diversity increased for many traits under mulching.
Information on Other biophysical impacts
Aboveground biomass averaged 319 g m⁻² in mulched, 301 g m⁻² in mown, 386 g m⁻² in fallow plots. Diversity and productivity were positively associated within treatments.

Key lessons
Mulching is a suitable, biodiversity-friendly management alternative for oligotrophic, acidic mountain meadows, promoting niche complementarity and preventing competitive exclusion. Detectable ecological divergence required 5–6 years, so short studies risk missing real trends. Management outcomes are climate and soil constrained in cold, acidic sites.
Success factor(s)
Success factor type Success factor role Comments Order
Other
main factor

Consistent annual timing of management

Conducted assessments (incl. economic)
secondary factor

long-term monitoring, access to comprehensive trait data

Successful coordination between authorities
main factor

collaboration between research institutes and the national park administration

Barrier
Barrier type Barrier role Comments Order
Driver
Driver type Driver role Comments Order
Balancing different objectives
main driver
Need for economically acceptable alternatives after abandonment of traditional hay-making and grazing, and for biodiversity conservation in seminatural meadows.
Flexibility adaptability
Findings apply to low-productivity, acidic, cool mountain meadows. Authors caution that mulching can be inappropriate in productive lowland meadows due to auto-eutrophication and biodiversity loss reported elsewhere. Context-specificity is key.
Cost effectiveness
No cost data. Ecologically, mulching provided a good compromise maintaining diversity and relatively high biomass without external fertiliser inputs.
English